![]() ![]() Couple that with it works very well, and has very strong compression at a high rate of compression speed. Macrium Reflect by far is the fastest at creating a backup of any disk imaging software I've ever used, and trusting it having had to use it to restore Windows speaks volumes - a software I can trust. Macrium also can do Incremental backups, so I'd be interested if anyone has timings for those. It gives you that revert to last know good configuration safety net which system restore points don't offer. ![]() So for me, spending 5 minutes a week to snapshot the system drive is time well spent. Keeping your system files and personal files separate is the key here. The HDD is backed up daily with just the normal 'what files have changed' backup software to a NAS. The SSD is imaged weekly and cloned monthly. My setup is a 120GiB SSD for system/program files and a 500GiB HDD for personal data. Sadly the Macrium logs for the Restore, last needed about 6 months ago, are gone (probably thanks to CC ) but the times were very similar to the backup, less than 10minutes certainly. (same SSD going to an external, USB3 connected, 7200rpm, hard drive) (internal SSD going to an internal HDD)įull disk clone takes 00:07:20 for the same 22GiBs. I use Macrium Reflect, and the stats are įull disk image takes 00:05:21 for 22GiBs. So I thought, with the view of spreading the word of their benefits, I'd start a topic to get feedback on those speeds so others can compare. ![]() In particular, the time taken to perform those tasks. Some recent threads have talked about using disk cloning/imaging software for backup/restore purposes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |